Bulletin Articles
A new bulletin article is posted every week! You can subscribe via our RSS feed or contact us via email to receive a mailed copy of the bulletin every two weeks. Both the electronic and mailed bulletins are provided free of charge.
Music
Seeing the similarities
Sunday, April 30, 2017Over the years, I have heard all kind of arguments to defend the use of instrumental music in worship. In the end it usually comes down to, “Well I like it, and I can’t see God not liking it.” For many, the passages that teach Christians to simply sing (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:17) fall on deaf ears. Perhaps it will help to draw a parallel to another invocation the early saints were guilty of doing.
In I Corinthians 11, the apostle Paul discussed how that local church decided to change the Lord’s Supper into a feast (verses 20-22). There is no question that the brethren were coming together as a church (verse 18). What does it matter if the congregation decided to make a feast out of the memorial of Christ’s death? These people enjoyed themselves by having their hunger pangs satisfied. God knows the heart, right? Why did Paul feel he was able to judge their actions? They would have needed to eat anyway – why is this a big deal? The Bible contains answers for all of these questions.
Paul made it clear that this was not what they did in the beginning (verse 23). Rather, this was something that evolved over time. Someone introduced this concept. This is our first parallel to instrumental music, which was introduced into a variety of religious groups around 670 AD. In other words, it took approximately 650 years to introduce the instrument to the worship service. Keep in mind that these religious groups were not the church you read about in the Bible.
There are several other parallels between the abuse of the Lord’s Supper and instrumental music in worship. Consider these points as you weigh the scriptures:
- Introducing a different form of worship divides the church (verse 18).
- Even if you say you are coming together for the Lord, you may still be coming together for the worse (verse 17).
- Even if you say you are coming together to take the Lord’s Supper, you may not actually take it (verse 20).
- A person can do nonsinful activities like eating on their own time. It is not necessary to add these things to worship (verse 22).
- If you think you are going to be praised an addition to worship, you would be wrong (verse 22).
- This change was not harmless as they were despising the church by not respecting authority (verse 22).
- It is incorrect to think that what I do in worship has no bearing on others (verse 21).
- The apostle was correct to tell them they were in the wrong (verse 17).
A review of these points will show that every argument made against modifying the Lord’s supper can be made against instrumental music in worship. Personal opinions on the matter need to be subjected to God’s word. If you say to yourself, “I just don’t see the similarities between the abuse of the Lord’s Supper and the abuse of singing psalms and hymns and spiritual song”, then you have closed your mind.
Chuck
What about the harps?
Sunday, February 19, 2017A couple of weeks ago we spent some time showing the difference between aids and additions. This was directed to the topic of instrumental music in worship. Those who don’t accept the fact that mechanical instruments are unauthorized, point out the verses in the New Testament that mention the harp. Thus, we shall examine each text to see what it is talking about.
I Corinthians 14:7-8: To save time with each text, I want to point out that none of them have anything to do with Christians gathering together on the first day of the week, to worship God. This passage mentioned, not only a harp, but a flute and trumpet. Why? Paul was dealing with the subject of speaking in tongues. He pointed out that, without understanding what is said, nothing is gained. Just as instruments make distinctive sounds. They were not mentioned as use in worship.
Revelation 5:8: This figurative vision, speaks of four living creatures and twenty-four elders than fell down, each having a harp, golden bowls of incense. Amidst those mentioned was a Lamb having seven horns and seven eyes. We know these are symbolic and there is a danger in making things literal that are meant figurative. Again, there isn’t the slightest hint of using instruments in worship today for God.
Revelation 14:2: The key to understanding this text is the word “like”. The voice that was heard from heaven sounded like many waters, loud thunder and someone playing harps. That is a rather odd combination, but these were just descriptive terms to try and relate what it sounded like. It wasn’t literally any of them.
Revelation 15:2: This passage, like the others we have looked at, are terms given to help describe what they saw. There were seven angels with seven plagues, something like a sea of glass mingled with fire. There was a beast with a mark and a name, and those standing on the sea of glass, having harps of God. Does this teach the use of instruments in worship? How?
Revelation 18:22: If you carefully read the text, the musicians of harpists, flutists, and trumpeters would not be heard anymore. They are linked with the destruction that will take place due to being destroyed by the power of God.
We could also go through the New Testament and find the verses that mention other kinds of instrument. The word trumpet is mentioned at least a dozen times. None of which was used to imply that saints today are to gather and use mechanical instruments in worship. It’s important that one understands what God authorizes in worship and what He doesn’t. It isn’t my place to say God hates instrumental music, in and of itself. Sort of like people trying to prove God approves of brethren being hospitable (Rom. 12:13), but doing such in worship doesn’t make sense.
Producing scriptures that show God approves of something, doesn’t mean you can apply that to any situation. That is very dangerous and inconsistent. There is no doubt that our God approved of a faithful sister’s act of making garments for widows (Acts 9:36-39). However, to show this text and say that God would accept, as worship, His people all sitting around and making garments together. I know this is sounding absurd, but I want us to see the principle.
Christians were commanded to sing (Eph. 5:19; Col. 3:16). Not to sing and play. That is adding to the word of God, which was are warned against (Gal. 1:6-9). The reason the early Christians didn’t use instruments, wasn’t because they didn’t have any, or couldn’t afford any. It was because they were not authorized, and didn’t need them to help them sing. Instruments are no more an aid to singing than taking a drink of soda aids in helping me take the fruit of the vine (I Cor. 11:23-26).
Chuck
What if I like having instrumental music in worship?
Sunday, September 04, 2016What if I like having
instrumental music in worship?
When discussing the subject of instrumental music in worship, most people are quick to defend the practice by simply saying that they like it. Interestingly, God likes it too! Yes, you heard me right. God not only likes instrumental music in worship, He demands and commands it. Let’s take a closer look at this subject.
You cannot find a clearer passage of scripture to reveal God’s expectations for worship than Colossians 3:16. “Let the word of Christ dwell in you richly in all wisdom, teaching and admonishing one another in psalms and hymns and spiritual songs, singing with grace in your hearts to the Lord.”
This verse is plain and clear – Christians are commanded to use a specific instrument for music in worship, namely their voices. This helps us understand why psalms and hymns and spiritual songs were listed. These forms of music contain words that we can use to praise the Lord and teach and admonish one another with. In contrast, the notes made by mechanical instruments cannot teach, admonish or offer praise.
Remember, the purpose of this article is to determine what is expected out of saints when they worship the Lord musically. Consider also Paul’s argument in I Corinthians 14:16. “What is the conclusion then? I will pray with the spirit, and I will also pray with the understanding. I will sing with the spirit, and I will also sing with the understanding.” Here again we see that we must understand what we are singing – merely offering music as general praise is not enough. Clearly, 1 Cor. 14:16 is not an admonition to “play” some sort of mechanical instrument with understanding.
Just as we need Biblical authority to use our voices as instruments to please our God, we should also seek Biblical authority to use mechanical instruments in worship. The fact is, the only instrument authorized is the voice. Many religious groups today will play instruments during prayer or when a teacher is winding down his lesson. Just as there is no scripture to support mechanical instruments for praising God in song, there is no Biblical support musical accompaniment during prayers and preaching either.
The verses of the New Testament feature a consistent pattern of acapella singing. When Paul and Silas were cast into prison and started to sing, is it logical to assume that they also started to play instruments (Acts 16:25)? Of course not. If we were hypothetically commanded to both sing and play instruments, then it would be sinful to sing without instrumental music. On top of that, it would be sinful if everyone was just singing and not playing an instrument.
“Is it wrong to sing praises to God without mechanical instruments?” Every time I have asked this question to someone advocating for instrumental music, the answer has always been “No!” I then ask how they can be so sure it is not wrong. My purpose is to get them to realize that Biblical authority is necessary and that anything else is just an opinion. I recall attending a denominational church years ago where a man got up and played a “spiritual song” that consisted solely of musical notes. There were no words at all. How does this match the instructions of 1 Cor. 14:16 or Col. 3:16? We need to listen to our God and walk by faith to please Him (Heb. 11:6). Only those who listen to His words and abide are walking by faith (Rom. 10:17).
Chuck
Let's think this through
Sunday, April 17, 2016Let’s think this through
I do not know how many times over the past month I have heard people say, “The definition of insanity is doing the same thing over and over and expecting a different result.” I like this statement, and it is thought provoking. From a Christian standpoint though, the opposite is also true. We could say “It is insane to do things differently and expect the same result.” Allow me to explain.
God’s people have been given a teaching that is unchanging (Rom. 6:17). This means we cannot add to it or take away from it (Gal. 1:6-9). Those who abide in the gospel are walking by faith (Rom. 10:17). Now here is the clincher – without faith it is impossible to please God (Heb. 11:6). Therefore, it is insane to do things differently than what God has authorized and still expect the same results as those who follow His word.
Everyone needs to understand that a person “doing things for God” is not automatically approved by God. If God does not approve of these things, then who are they truly being done for? If you insist that God approves of something (or if you think He should approve of it) and are unwilling to confirm this in His word, then you are really doing it for yourself. The Bible is filled with examples of this behavior Consider Cain (Gen. 4), Nadab and Abihu (Lev. 10) and those Jesus called out (Matt. 15:7-9).
Read on to understand why some vainly do things differently than God’s word describe and yet expect the same outcomes as those who faithfully follow His word.
Is it the thought that counts?
If God does not care how we serve Him, then why give the gospel? Why warn of punishment for those who do not obey His word or abide in it (II Thess. 1:8; II John 9)? If all that counted was the thought, John 4:24 would have been written to say, “God is Spirit, they that worship Him, must worship Him in spirit.” But we all know it continues on to say, “and in truth.”
Do the differences matter?
Our Lord commands that we sing (Eph. 5:19). Someone says, “We sing and play instruments in worship – it’s the same!” This is not the same – God’s word did not mention instruments. Our Lord commands that we belong to the church Christ built (Matt. 16:18; Acts 2:47; 20:28; Rom. 16:16). Someone says, “We belong to a denomination – it’s the same!” This is not the same – Jesus founded His church, not the denomination. Our Lord commands we have authority for everything we do (Col. 3:17; II Tim. 3:16-17). Someone says, “We don’t have Biblical support for everything we do, but it is still the same!” No it’s not – without God’s word, you are establishing your own religion.
Should we focus on God’s love and not His wrath?
Most people are annoyed when someone tells us what should or should not bother us. Imagine how God feels when people insist that certain behaviors should not upset Him even though His word teaches on these subjects! God’s love and wrath co-exist. We know this because God loves everyone and does want anyone to perish (John 3:16; II Pet. 3:9). Does that mean love overlooks sin? Of course not, which is why many will be lost (Matt. 7:13-14). For some reason, those who are in religious error always think the lost are somehow different from them. In reality, they themselves are lost.
Let us be rational thinks and not insane – if we do things differently than are described in God’s word, we should not expect the same outcomes as those who abide in His word.
Chuck