In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was over the face of the deep.

(Genesis 1.1-2)

The first two sentences of the Bible testify to  the central truth of our lives.  There exists an all-powerful being, independent of the natural universe, and he is its designer and builder.  Just saying it doesn’t make it so, but the purpose of Genesis is not to prove anything.  Rather, it provides answers from that powerful, transcendent being—let’s call him God—that we can choose to to reject, or to accept on faith.  The Apostle Paul later observed that “what can be known about God is plain to” all mankind,

because God has shown it to them. For his invisible attributes, namely, his eternal power and divine nature, have been clearly perceived, ever since the creation of the world, in the things that have been made.

(Romans 1.19-20)

The creation itself testifies to its creator; but what else does he tell us about the process?

And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. And God saw that the light was good. And God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night. And there was evening and there was morning, the first day.

(Genesis 1.3-5)

God took the formless “void” of verse 2, and started not only making new things, but creating order, as well.  Light was new, but God didn’t completely banish the darkness that had existed already.  Instead, he gave boundaries to each, and arranged a pattern for later, as yet nonexistent intelligent minds to discover, analyze, and appreciate.

And God said, “Let there be an expanse in the midst of the waters, and let it separate the waters from the waters.” …And it was so. And God called the expanse Heaven. And there was evening and there was morning, the second day.

(Genesis 1.6-8)

This is another setting of boundaries, another layer of order imposed upon the primeval chaos.  This time the entities organized are more concrete, but still vast.  The result is another pair of distinct arenas, unpopulated for now, but with endless potential.

And God said, “Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together into one place, and let the dry land appear.” And it was so.

…And God said, “Let the earth sprout vegetation, plants yielding seed, and fruit trees bearing fruit in which is their seed, each according to its kind, on the earth.” And it was so. …And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the third day.

(Genesis 1.9-13)

God already organized the creation into vertical divisions, and now he does the same horizontally.  This is also the first appearance of life—plant, and not animal.  When we consider the arrangement of the story, it’s clear that God considers this to be part of the environment—the background, and not among the proper subjects of his creation, which will begin to appear, the next day.

And God said, “Let there be lights in the expanse of the heavens to separate the day from the night.” …And God saw that it was good. And there was evening and there was morning, the fourth day.

(Genesis 1.14-19)

Now we have things that move.  They’re described in figurative terms, as if they had their own agency, to “rule” over day and night (v16)—the domains created on Day 1.

And God said, “Let the waters swarm with swarms of living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the expanse of the heavens.” …And there was evening and there was morning, the fifth day.

(Genesis 1.20-23)

Animal life is made on Day 5, and the sheer multitude—“swarms”—highlights that the creation has gone from chaos, to order, to a level of complexity that appears, from a distance, to be more chaos!  These creatures populate the domains God created on Day 2.

And God said, “Let the earth bring forth living creatures according to their kinds—livestock and creeping things and beasts of the earth according to their kinds.” And it was so.

…Then God said, “Let us make man in our image, after our likeness. And let them have dominion over the fish of the sea and over the birds of the heavens and over the livestock and over all the earth and over every creeping thing that creeps on the earth.”

So God created man in his own image,

in the image of God he created him;

        male and female he created them.

…And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.

(Genesis 1.24-31)

The final level of complexity comes with independent creatures inhabiting the domains created on Day 3.  This culminates in the most important of God’s creations, man, who sits atop the hierarchy of creatures, and is the only creation to bear the image of God.  The rest was all made in service to this greatest specimen of God’s handiwork.

And on the seventh day God finished his work that he had done, and he rested on the seventh day from all his work that he had done.

(Genesis 2.2)

The narrative does little, up to this point, to explain what is the purpose of all this; but God clearly considers it a job well done, and his cessation of activity on the seventh day constitutes, in a way, one final creation—the concept of satisfied rest.  If we appreciate his creation, we also ought to long for that same sense of completion and delight, as well as to share them with God, in God’s own presence.

So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God, for whoever has entered God’s rest has also rested from his works as God did from his.

Let us therefore strive to enter that rest…

(Hebrews 4.9-11)

Jeremy Nettles

In last week’s article, we examined Psalm 1, which says, “Blessed is the man who” shuns evil and dedicates himself to keeping God’s commandments (v1).  This is true, of course; but on this side of the cross, God has revealed more to us about his character, plans, and expectations.  The book of Psalms began with a short statement on being “blessed.”  As recorded in Matthew’s Gospel, Jesus’ ministry began in the same way.

Seeing the crowds, he went up on the mountain, and when he sat down, his disciples came to him.

And he opened his mouth and taught them, saying:

“Blessed are the poor in spirit, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

(Matthew 5.1-3)

It’s almost unthinkable to call poverty a blessing, but Jesus isn’t talking about physical possessions.  He also doesn’t mean the sort of person we might call “morally bankrupt”—this spiritual poverty has to do with recognizing your own insufficiency and need for God.  We all share that circumstance, of course; but many don’t acknowledge it!  Happy is he, who knows he must rely on God!

“Blessed are those who mourn, for they shall be comforted.”

(Matthew 5.4)

We might think Jesus means the one who is mourning has nowhere to go, but up.  But, in the first place, that’s not true; and in the second place, his point is really spiritual.  The person who recognizes that sin and death are grievous evils, and longs for their abolition and the fixing of everything broken, sees that life is not about this earth, but about eternity.  To understand that is a great blessing.

“Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.”

(Matthew 5.5)

“Meek” does not mean weak, but it does mean humble or lowly.  It is the opposite of proud.  The meek person has deliberately chosen a lower status, rather than pursuing advancement and suffering humiliation.

“Blessed are those who hunger and thirst for righteousness, for they shall be satisfied.”

(Matthew 5.6)

Those who long to see righteousness also long to be righteous.  In Jesus, we can see the embodiment of righteousness, and by faith in him, we can become righteous, too (Ro 4.5)!

“Blessed are the merciful, for they shall receive mercy.”

(Matthew 5.7)

From an earthly perspective, it doesn’t make sense to show mercy.  The guilty are likely to reoffend, and so the merciful not only miss the opportunity to seek compensation, but also leave themselves open to being hurt again!  But without God’s mercy we’re all destined for eternal torment; and God expects us to learn his ways, and shoulder a tiny portion of the burden he carries.

“Blessed are the pure in heart, for they shall see God.”

(Matthew 5.8)

Purity begins in the heart.  A person can appear pure on the outside, yet harbor all sorts of evil within.  Jesus said the Pharisees were “whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness” (Mt 23.27).  Another person might not look like much on the outside, “but the Lord looks on the heart” (1Sa 16.7).

“Blessed are the peacemakers, for they shall be called sons of God.”

(Matthew 5.9)

God adopts peacemakers into his own family.  He is the ultimate peacemaker, destroying wickedness and reconciling its slaves to himself, through his own self-sacrifice.

“Blessed are those who are persecuted for righteousness’ sake, for theirs is the kingdom of heaven.”

(Matthew 5.10)

No one enjoys being persecuted, of course—“For the moment all discipline seems painful rather than pleasant” (He 12.11a).  But nested within that verse is an important point—suffering persecution is a form of discipline from God!  It’s not that we’re persecuted to punish us for our sins—Jesus spoke of persecution “for righteousness’ sake,” which is to say, being singled out and harmed for good behavior, of which the persecutor nevertheless does not approve.  But discipline isn’t always punitive.  Training for a marathon is extremely uncomfortable, and yet the one who perseveres through that discomfort stands a much better chance of finishing the race!  This discipline “yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness to those who have been trained by it” (He 12.11b).

“Blessed are you when others revile you and persecute you and utter all kinds of evil against you falsely on my account. Rejoice and be glad, for your reward is great in heaven, for so they persecuted the prophets who were before you.”

(Matthew 5.11-12)

This last of the beatitudes is tied closely to the one that preceded it.  Both mention persecution by name, as well as a heavenly reward.  But this one includes more details, focused on the words people say about you.  No one likes to be slandered and torn down before the whole world, especially if it’s based on lies.  Jesus points out that most of the people we honor and regard from ages past, endured exactly this sort of treatment!

The central point, for all of these blessings, is that the way to be blessed, is not to focus your efforts on earthly rewards!  Those who are truly blessed are looking forward to heavenly rewards, which transcend and outlast this world.  If we only regarded Psalm 1, we might have pursued righteousness in the expectation of having a pleasant life on earth, as a result.  Jesus tells us, that’s not the point!  Whatever happens to us here, the one who is truly blessed, is the one who makes his home with Christ in heaven.

Jeremy Nettles

Blessed is the man

who walks not in the counsel of the wicked,

nor stands in the way of sinners,

nor sits in the seat of scoffers…

(Psalm 1.1)

Thus begins the book of Psalms.  To some degree, the first of 150 poems in this book serves as a prologue to the collection.  This Psalm is all-encompassing, and provides a framework upon which each individual has a lifetime to build.

It begins with the loaded word, “blessed.”  The Hebrew behind it is אֶשֶׁר-ĕshĕr, which strictly means happiness.  Similarly, the Septuagint—the Greek Old Testament—begins with μακάριος-makarios-“happy.”  But this is not to say all our bibles have the wrong translation.  It is understood in the context—cultural as well as textual—that happiness is more than the subjective feeling of contentment, satisfaction, or pleasure.  It ought to go without saying, that a truly “happy” person can only be so as a result of receiving favor from someone far more capable than he.  It could be rendered fortunate instead, but that leaves it too impersonal, refusing to answer the question, who has bestowed this good fortune?  No, this psalmist, along with the other authors of the Bible, took for granted that one person in particular ought to be credited with all good fortune.  The man who shuns sin and lays up God’s word in his heart is not just happy or lucky—rather, he is “blessed.”

The rest of verse 1 shows a progression from walking, to standing, to sitting.  From his active conduct—walking—to his less dynamic but still deliberate associations—standing—to where he comfortably rests—sitting—he always avoids the ungodly,

but his delight is in the law of the Lord,

and on his law he meditates day and night.

(Psalm 1.2)

He spends his time thinking about and pursuing the fulfillment of God’s instructions.  Does he do this out of a grudging sense of obligation, or purely out of fear that God will probably smite him, otherwise?  No—God’s commandments are a “delight” to him!

What will be the result of this approach, shunning unrighteousness and aiming to please God?

He is like a tree

planted by streams of water

that yields its fruit in its season,

and its leaf does not wither.

In all that he does, he prospers.

(Psalm 1.3)

For those living in areas of North America with relatively high population density, this metaphor may be confusing.  Trees growing on the banks of our rivers and streams are inherently unstable due to soil compromised by constant saturation, changing conditions due to water level fluctuations, erosion, and especially the simple fact that one side of the tree’s root system finds only water, and no soil to anchor it in place.  Most trees situated far from rivers get along just fine on rain.  But Israel gets much less rain, and has no rivers as vast as those we take for granted.  On top of that, the tree envisioned here is not a giant, heavy oak, tulip, or catalpa!  No, the image is one of a fruit tree in a well-watered area, that can be trusted year by year to produce lots of fruit.  The idea is that the person who plants himself, so to speak, in God’s word will find in it a reliable source of life and prosperity.  This will lead to obvious outward signs that he is thriving and vibrant—healthy leaves—and also to appropriate fruit of good works, which in turn are a life-sustaining blessing to those upon whom they are bestowed.

The righteous, who serve God, are blessed.

The wicked are not so,

but are like chaff that the wind drives away.

(Psalm 1.4)

Chaff is the dry, useless stalks and husks that are noticeable chiefly as an annoying impurity that must be sorted from the good fruit or grain.  Whereas the well-watered tree remains steadfast and reliable, the chaff is blown before the wind, with no way to decide for itself where it will next land, no benefit to anyone, and no purpose to fulfill.

Therefore the wicked will not stand in the judgment,

nor sinners in the congregation of the righteous;

for the Lord knows the way of the righteous,

but the way of the wicked will perish.

(Psalm 1.5-6)

Because the righteous man prospers while the wicked are ineffectual, the wicked are destined to fall.  The expected setting of their fall is “the judgement”—but what does that mean?  Clearly it’s not just a judgment, as in a particular court case or something of that sort.  In the context of the psalm, it most likely refers to an expected instance of divine retribution, such as a plague or an invasion.  At the same time, it of course contributes to a growing body of Old Testament hints and shadows of the final judgment to come, which the New Testament predicts clearly.

…it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment…

(Hebrews 9.27)

When that occurs, who will stand among the righteous assembly?  Of course, it it those who are righteous—but that’s not the only point worth noticing.  Verse 6 says, “the Lord knows the way of the righteous.”  Is he unaware of the wicked?  Clearly not, or how could he judge them?  But this knowledge is not about intellectual understanding or recognition.  The righteous man avoids the “way of sinners” in verse 1, not because he hasn’t noticed it, but because he sees it for what it is—and will not make it his way!  God “knows the way of the righteous,” because it is his own chosen path.  Walk it, with him.

Jeremy Nettles

The beginning of the gospel of Jesus Christ, the Son of God.

(Mark 1.1)

Thus begins one of the four accounts of Jesus’ earthly life, written by Apostles and their associates.  But why are there four of them?  Which one gets the story right?  In fact, isn’t there just one gospel?  Paul wrote to a group of new and erring Christians,

I am astonished that you are so quickly deserting him who called you in the grace of Christ and are turning to a different gospel—not that there is another one, but there are some who trouble you and want to distort the gospel of Christ. But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach to you a gospel contrary to the one we preached to you, let him be accursed. As we have said before, so now I say again: If anyone is preaching to you a gospel contrary to the one you received, let him be accursed.

(Galatians 1.6-9)

Which of the Gospels had they heard, and which was now leading them astray?  Of course, that’s not what Paul meant.  The word gospel has different senses.  Two of them are distinguished using capitalization—a Gospel is a written work that tells the story of Jesus’ life on earth, culminating in his death, burial, and resurrection.  That is also the core of the gospel—lowercase, this time—which is the good news about the coming of Jesus’ kingdom.  The Galatians had been fooled by a perversion of that message; but the four Evangelists wrote four accounts of Jesus’ life, from different perspectives, highlighting different parts of the story, aimed at different audiences, each with his own purpose.  None of them pretends to include every detail, and in fact John issues an explicit disclaimer at the end of his book:

Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

(John 21.25)

So what makes each of the Gospels special?

Matthew

The book of the genealogy of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.

(Matthew 1.1)

Within the title sentence are several details that help us to see Matthew’s purpose.  First is the allusion to Genesis, which introduces several sections using similar language (Ge 2.4, 6.9, 10.1, 11.27, 25.12 et al.).  Even if that allusion hadn’t made it clear, the focus on Jesus’ lineage from David and Abraham emphasizes his Jewish identity.  Matthew knew that Jesus is the Savior of the whole world, not just Jews—in fact, his book makes a stronger case than the other three for this very point (cf. Mt 8.10-12 & 28-34, 11.21-24, 15.21-28, 20.1-16, 22.1-10, 25.31-32, 28.19-20).  But from the beginning it’s clear that he’s writing for a Jewish audience.  Of the four, this Gospel spends the most time tearing down Pharisaism and pointing out Jesus’ fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.

Mark

This is the most vivid Gospel.  Mark spends no time on background information or long speeches.  He jumps into the action immediately, and that’s where his focus remains for the whole book, with evocative, yet concise language.  Despite usually providing the most vivid detail to help his readers envision each episode, Mark is the shortest of the four Gospels.  There are numerous other features that won’t fit here, which indicate Mark wrote for a Roman audience.  The central declaration about Jesus comes from a Roman soldier:

And when the centurion, who stood facing him, saw that in this way he breathed his last, he said, “Truly this man was the Son of God!”

(Mark 15.39)

Luke

Inasmuch as many have undertaken to compile a narrative of the things that have been accomplished among us, just as those who from the beginning were eyewitnesses and ministers of the word have delivered them to us, it seemed good to me also, having followed all things closely for some time past, to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus, that you may have certainty concerning the things you have been taught.

(Luke 1.1-4)

Luke is obviously an intellectual.  In fact, he was a physician (Co 4.14), and his discussion of healings and other medical topics reflects this.  His telling of the Gospel story is the most verbose, and he includes many episodes that the other three leave out.  Of the four, Luke is most concerned with background and context, and his Gospel is the most artfully rendered.  It is the scholar’s Gospel.

John

In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was in the beginning with God. All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. In him was life, and the life was the light of men.

(John 1.1-4)

John discusses spiritual things as easily as others discuss physical things.  His Gospel stands in a class of its own.  It’s as if Matthew is playing the trumpet, Mark is playing the tympani, Luke is playing the violin, and John is playing golf.  The others tell a harmonious story, each instrument leaving a particular impression on the listener.  John, on the other hand, has read the conditions of the ground and the wind, and uses a set of specialized tools and highly refined skills to push the reader closer and closer to a very specific spot.  Where is that spot?

Now Jesus did many other signs in the presence of the disciples, which are not written in this book; but these are written so that you may believe that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of God, and that by believing you may have life in his name.

(John 20.30-31)

Jeremy Nettles

Finally, brothers, whatever is true, whatever is honorable, whatever is just, whatever is pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is commendable, if there is any excellence, if there is anything worthy of praise, think about these things.

(Philippians 4.8)

As Paul sat imprisoned, writing the letter to the Christians of Philippi, he was sure he would soon be acquitted, released, and given the opportunity to travel to Philippi again and see his dear friends in person.  Pretty sure.  Like, a solid 75% sure.  Nevertheless, he wrote as if it would be his last communication with these brothers and sisters, making sure to leave nothing unsaid that he’d regret, if his expectations were thwarted.  He wrapped up this task with a list of the things that ought to occupy the Christian’s mind.

True
Sometimes the exegesis of this passage, and others like it, begins and ends with John 17.17, in which Jesus says to his Father, “your word is truth.”  Thus, the meaning is taken to be, meditate on God’s word.  That’s certainly a good practice and is included in the point Paul is making, but it’s bigger than that.  Seek a true understanding of all things, both what you read in the Bible and what you see in the world.  Satan is the “father of lies” (Jn 8.44), but the children of God should oppose every lie, whether about the Scriptures or about the nature of the world and the events that take place therein.

Honorable
This is another basic concept that seems as if it should require little explanation.  Yet upon reflection we will discover that it’s hard to define what is honorable in specific terms.  We could offer examples of honorable and dishonorable conduct, and make further judgments on a case-by-case basis; but at its root, the notion is one of outshining others in a field.  In older literature, the Greek word behind honorable, σεμνά-semna, was even used in a negative sense, to mean “haughty” or “pompous;” but in the New Testament it instead always carries the connotation of deserving respect, not merely demanding it.

Just
How much more basic can we get?  Justice is when each person gets what he deserves, in the way it ought to be given; but what Paul means is broader.  Our English word, just, comes from the Latin iustus, which in turn is built on the more fundamental ius, meaning “law”—not a law, but the general concept and body of law.  Likewise, the Greek word in Philippians 4.8, δίκαια, is about an entire manner of life consistent with moral law.

Pure
We think of purity as meaning the absence of unwanted substances, and this  applies in moral terms, too.  The word translated pure in our text, ἁγνά-hagna, signifies innocence as we would expect—but in a decidedly divine sense!  It’s a moral and religious purity, not just homogeneity of any old sort.

Lovely
This word is usually associated with visible beauty.  Is that where Paul is telling Christians to put their focus?  Well, no; but it is included under the broader umbrella of loveliness!  This has been hijacked and abused in our culture more than in most, but at its root physical beauty is found in embodying the ideals of God’s creation.  What is lovely gives us innocent delight.  We must be careful to avoid taking this to an extreme, because an improper focus on pleasure is called sensuality, and is numbered among the “works of the flesh” in Galatians 5.19-21, which keep a person from the kingdom of God.  But rather than putting our focus on what delights our eyes and flesh, we should contemplate the things that delight God, and seek to share that delight.

Commendable
To commend is to publicly voice approval to a person, practice, thing, or idea.  In its most literal sense, the Greek word, εὔφημα-euphēma, signifies speaking well of someone or something.  Is Paul telling us to put stock in man’s approval, now?  Yes, up to a point.  Clearly, he doesn’t mean that we should seek to please man instead of God—as he himself wrote, “If I were still trying to please man, I would not be a servant of Christ” (Ga 1.10)!  At the same time, while man is fickle and his tastes changing, mankind still possesses an incredibly consistent common sense regarding basic morality.  Paul instructed elsewhere that we should “give thought to do what is honorable in the sight of all” (Ro 12.17).  Meditate on such things as ought to meet with man’s approval.

Excellence
The Greek word behind this, ἀρετή-aretē,  means virtue; but that’s not quite a sufficient definition.  It does signify living by rules and ideals, but to an extent not often seen!  “Excellence” means more than just goodness, but rather superior, distinct, or eminent goodness.  It’s less about measuring up to a standard, and more about surpassing one’s peers in moral uprightness—not for the sake of competition, but out of a sense of duty.

Praiseworthy
Doesn’t “worthy of praise” mean the same thing as “commendable,” earlier in the verse?  Very nearly so.  But it’s hardly likely that Paul would finish out this list with a redundancy, so we ought to consider further.  Before, the focus was on things that are well spoken of, among men.  “Praise,” while it certainly could apply to the same social context, also opens the door to a higher realm—as Paul wrote about the devoted Jew circumcised in heart and not merely body, “His praise is not from man but from God” (Ro 2.29).  Live in such a way as to receive his praise, regardless of who else hears it.

Jeremy Nettles