The use of church funds

      We all know that religious groups today have used their collections to fund everything from pizza parties, senior trips to building gymnasiums and having day care centers. The question is, are there binding examples that will limit the use of church funds, and help use know what they are to be used for?                                                                                 

Let me just say that if there are no binding examples in scripture, then we must just as well discard the Bible, for the flood-gate would open up. This is no more true than when it comes to the church funds that are collected. And since many do not respect approved examples as a means to establishing authority, you have religious groups doing anything they want with their funds. This is the reason why people make light of this whole discussion.

We can quickly set some boundaries if we have a scripture that will come right out and limit the use of church funds. There is and it is found in I Timothy 5:16. Read this text carefully. You will notice that Christians were given a responsibility to take care of a financial need that the church was not responsible for thus making a distinction between the work of an individual and the work of the church. Failure to see this, we cause one to miss the binding examples surrounding church funds.

Local church take up a collection each Sunday (I Cor. 16:1-2), for the work of the church. What are those works? Evangelism (Eph. 3:10); Edification (Eph. 4:120 and helping needy saints (II Cor. 8:1-4).  Within these three areas we have examples of churches sending to brethren in need. We have examples of preachers being supported directly, to preach (II Cor. 11:8). Notice that we do not have examples of churches sending money to another church to support preachers. Is that significant? Yes. The pattern of sending directly to the one preaching hold the local church accountable to making sure they support faithful men. If church “A” sent funds to church “B”, and the support a false teacher, how does church “A” know it?  We need to see the wisdom of God in providing us with approved examples as a means of establishing Biblical authority.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Chuck

Why are examples binding? 

 Establishing Biblical authority for everything we do is vital for every Christian (Col. 3:17; I Pet. 4:11). However, how people go about establishing that authority has caused much disagreement in the religious realm.  Some have argued that examples are not a reliable tool in proving that God expects and demands His people do them today. Let’s consider this matter.

The first thing we need to understand is that we are talking about approved examples. When you find followers of Christ doing things that they were punished for, obviously we are NOT to follow their example (Acts 5:1-4; I Cor. 5:1-3, etc.). We also need to see that approved examples are governed by general and specific authority. By that I mean, when we read about Christians gathering in an “upper room” to worship (Acts 20:8), we are not limited to meeting in an upper room only, because there are examples of people meeting in different places (Rom. 16:3-5, etc.). Therefore, there was the specific command to worship (Jn. 4:24), but where you do it is open, thus, it is general.

I imagine one of the easiest ways to show that approved examples are binding today is due to the fact that we are told they are. Paul, in addressing the saints in Philippi, stated, “The things which you learned and received and heard and saw in me, these do, and the God of peace will be with you.” (Phil. 4:9). Nothing is more powerful than being told to follow the example of Jesus Christ (I Pet. 2:21).  There is authority in imitating, which again, is why Paul said to “imitate me” (I Cor. 4:16).

The difficulty in learning about the binding of examples, is knowing what was done lawfully as a custom that isn’t binding today. After all, we know that when Christians took the Lord’s Supper on the first day of the week (Acts 20:7), that it wasn’t a custom. We know there was commands to gather together regularly to remember the death of Christ (Matt. 26:26-28; I Cor. 11:23-26). So, knowing that Paul waited in Troas, 7 days (Acts 20:6), before heading back out. This way he could assemble with the saints on the first day of the week. We know we do not have authority to take the Lord’s Supper on any other day of the week.

When the above point is made, those is disagreement will then say, how come you do not greet one another with a holy kiss (Rom. 16:16)? If we state that it was the greeting custom of that day, they want to know how you know what examples are custom and what examples are binding today? The answer again goes back to understanding general and specific authority. If we had an example of Christians assembling on a different day of the week in a different place and time, then obviously the first day of the week would not be binding.  How did people greet one another in New Testament times? We might say, with a holy kiss? Yes. But was the emphasis on the “holy” or the “kiss”? Our greetings must be genuine. Did Judas greet Jesus with a “holy” kiss, when he betrayed the Lord? Of course not. 

The word greet means to welcome or salute. This is exactly how you could greet brethren even in a letter, which Paul often did (I Cor. 16:19; Phil. 4:21; Titus 3:15, etc.). Keep in mind that all examples that are binding today have a specific significance attached to it.  With Jesus resurrecting on the first day of the week, with the Holy Spirit coming upon the apostles and preaching the first time since Christ’s ascension, on the first day of the week, points to the significance of the example of the Christians taking the Lord’s Supper on that day. So, when you focus on the holy “kiss”, there isn’t any such significance attacked to the kiss in itself.  It is the holy greeting we need to focus on.

In our next article we will examine the work of the church in the area of binding examples. 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                    Chuck

Are you a good recruit for a cult?

Based on my experiences, members of cults seem to share some common characteristics. This article will examine the qualities that make a person a prime target for recruitment into a religious cult. We will do this by noting people in New Testament times who exhibited the same traits and became victims of false teachers.

Be influenced more by the teacher than the teaching

An example of this is found in Acts 14:8-18. Paul and Barnabas healed a man. The people tried to worship them as Gods, but Paul and Barnabas insisted that they were just men and should not be treated that way (verses 12-14). Even after this, they could not stop the multitude from sacrificing to them (verse 18). This happened with teachers who tried to stop correct the crowd - imagine what could happen if Paul and Barnabas encouraged the crowd to worship them instead! Cult teachers tend to be intimidating to begin with. When they find someone who can be so influenced by a teacher, they will have an easy time recruiting followers.

Do not question the teacher nor their teachings

Stories about the shady practices of cult leaders are easy to find in the media, yet their followers are often not dissuaded. Why not? Followers have blind allegiance and refuse to ask hard questions about the cult, its leaders, its teachings, etc. Not only that, followers will defend their actions and teachings. This sounds Biblically familiar.

Jesus asked, “Can the blind lead the blind? Will they not both fall into the ditch? A disciple is not above his teacher, but everyone who is perfectly trained will be like his teacher,” (Luke 6:39-40). Just as a righteous teacher can foster righteous disciples, false teachers can foster lost, unquestioning followers.

Avoid those who believe differently

The biggest fear cults have is losing their converts. If they had the truth, they would not have to be afraid. However, they want complete and utter control of all their members. This is achieved by isolating them from family and friends. They are trained only to talk with those who will listen and not question – other people like them. In contrast, Christians are encouraged to associate with non-Christians in order to have a positive influence (Matt. 5:13-16; I Cor. 7:13-16, I Cor. 5:9-10). We do not want Christians to fall away but also do not fear a fallen Christian exposing “secrets” or the inner-workings of the church like those who leave cults tend to do.

Develop an irrational confidence in the cult’s teaching

Christians are told to examine themselves regularly to make sure they are in the faith (II Cor. 13:5). Many Christians, including the apostles, had to be rebuked for doing things that were wrong (Gal. 2:11-12; Gal. 1:6-9; I Cor. 5:1-2; Acts 5:1-5). I have been in many studies with those who belong to cults. I consistently tell them that while I do not believe I am wrong, I will certainly admit that I am if it can be proven. When I ask them to state the same, they refuse. Why? They are puffed up and think the cult is infallible. We all need to remember the words in Romans 12:3, “…not to think of himself more highly than he ought to think, but to think soberly, as God has dealt to each one a measure of faith.”

Cults only have as much power as their members give them. Let us consider these Biblical examples and remember that faith grounded in genuine truth has nothing to hide!

                                                                                  Chuck

Does God appoint them?

The other day I Goggled, “How many countries are in the world?” Most parties agree that the answer is 196, but some counts were higher or lower depending on whether certain territories were recognized as their own countries. Does our heavenly Father control who governs each of those countries? If there are Christians in every one of those countries, can they use the Bible to say that whatever is happening where they live is a fulfillment of prophecy?

I raise this issue because many religious people mishandle the scriptures. Some contend that whatever is happening in America is a fulfillment of what you read about in the book of Revelation and in other parts of the Bible. Let’s look into this and clear some things up.

First, we need to make note of Romans 13:1-7. In this text, Paul mentions some important facts that would apply to anyone, anywhere, who was reading the passage.  He teaches that it is the responsibility of every saint to be subject to their governing authorities no matter the form of government – a democracy, a republic, a dictatorship, etc. (verse 1). This same verse reveals that all earthly authorities are appointed to rule by God. Christians who resist these earthly authorities are resisting the ordinance of God (verse 2).

But does God ensure that certain people are elected and others are not? “God appointed” means “God has permitted”. For example, Pilate stated that he had power to crucify Christ or release Him. Jesus replied that, “You could have not power at all against Me unless it had been given you from above,” (John 19:11).  Yes, God no more put Pilate in office than He did make Him crucify Christ. Leaders have free will, yet it is also true that our Creator has ordained governments in order to support those who do good works (Rom. 13:3). As Paul told the Roman brethren, citizens who obey should generally not have fear of their governments.

What about immoral governments? Are Christians obligated to live under their rule? Paul taught that Christians are to be loyal subjects and therefore pay taxes. This is done both to avoid the wrath of the government and for the sake of conscience (Rom. 13:5-7). Keep in mind that he was telling this to Christians who lived under corrupts and often cruel Roman rulers. The Roman leaders were sinful, but these Christians were still supposed to respect their authority. This is true for modern Christians too - they should respect their government officials even if they do not agree with every decision they make.

The word of God is relevant for people living in the United States today, but it was not written just those living in the United States. Many people believe that Christianity is a western religion because Jesus was born as a Jew (Luke 1:30). We must remember, though, that Jesus lived as God before coming to the earth (John 1:1). It is also important to remember that all are one in Christ – there is neither Jew nor Greek, neither male nor female (Gal. 3:28).

Christ came and died for all of mankind, not just select groups. He reigns at the right hand of the Father (Acts 2:29-36) and has made eternal life available to those who obey Him. The fulfillment of Gen. 12:3 happens whenever anyone obeys the gospel (Gal. 3:29).  It is dangerous to force modern events to fulfill of Biblical prophecy, especially the figurative language found in Revelations. Those who do this are creating their own doctrine (discussed in the following article).

Saints know that doing anything against the will of God is sin, and God has called us to obey our earthly leaders. We may not love every decision our earthly governments make, but we should recognize God’s wisdom that having government is better than no government!

   Chuck

Jesus Christ is the same yesterday, today and forever

You may have recognized the title from Hebrews 13:8. This is a great statement and worthy of examination. What did the inspired writer of Hebrews mean by stating that Jesus is the same yesterday, today and forever? Here are some valuable lessons to learn:

Jesus has not changed

In a world where technology changes faster than we can keep up, the Lord is a constant. He was our Savior yesterday, He is our Savior today and He will continue to be our Savior in the future (Phil. 3:20). Because Christ continues to be the way and the truth and the life, the way unto the Father will never change (John 14:6). Other “prophets” might wrongly teach other paths, but Jesus remains the same!

Jesus’ authority has not changed

Relating to our previous point, Christ has all authority (Matt. 28:18) and will continue to do so. The Father cried out from heaven that we are to listen to His Son (Matt. 17:5). Whatever was done yesterday, is done today and will be done in the future must be by the authority of Christ (Col. 3:17). This power is as much in effect today as it was after His death – the authority does not pass away with time. Recall that the Hebrew writer started off his book by stating that the Father has spoken unto us by His Son in these last days (Heb. 1:2).

Jesus’ words have not changed

The passing of time will never mean that the Lord’s words need to be updated. Jesus Himself told His followers that they would be guided into all truth (John 16:13). This statement assures us that we have all we need – no additional truth needs to be delivered. Moreover, these delivered words of Christ that were here yesterday, today and forever are the words by which we will all judged (John 12:48). As followers of Christ, we should be encouraged by this consistency. We need to value and remember that fact that our Lord and Savior is the same yesterday, today and forever.                                                                

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                     Chuck