“Silenced”

Sunday, October 03, 2021

Jesus described John the Baptist as greater than all of “those born of women” (Lk 7.28).  Yet he spent the last several months of his life wasting away in a prison, cut off from his disciples, cut off from society, cut off from his purpose of preparing the way for the Lord.

This man had said many of the same things that later  irritated the rulers about Jesus—he called the Pharisees and Sadducees a “brood of vipers” and said they would be “cut down and thrown into the fire” (Mt 3.7 & 10).  He told those with plenty—not just the rich, but all of those who weren’t destitute—to “share with him who has none” (Lk 3.11).  He told the wealthy (and unscrupulous) tax collectors, “Collect no more than you are authorized to do” (v13), and told soldiers not to make use of their strength to oppress the weak (v14), which were some of the primary reasons people got into those professions in the first place!  He told the crowds of his followers that they needed to be winnowed and threshed, and that the chaff—including people present to hear the message—would be burned “with unquenchable fire” when the Messiah came (v17).  All of this they tolerated, and even accepted.  But when John told king Herod, “It is not lawful for you to have” Herodias, the wife of Herod’s brother Philip, that was too much (Mt 14.4).  Herod “seized John and bound him and put him in prison” (v3).

It’s not that there was no one else who would have liked to silence John—but isn’t it a slightly amusing situation?  Large groups of people were willing to put up with John convicting them of broad, generic, sinful habits.  Yet, one man, upon being alerted to the very obvious fact God had prohibited adultery (Ex 20.14 et al.), and even more specifically adultery with one’s sister-in-law (Le 18.16), was unwilling either to accept the reproof and repent of his blatant and grotesque sin, or even to simply ignore the man who brought it up!  No, John had dared to level accusations against someone powerful, and what’s worse, they were obviously true!  Perhaps Herod worried that shining a light on his misbehavior could turn the public, the priesthood, and the council against him, thus weakening his hold on what power he possessed in Judea.  But really, he just didn't like being measured against a standard he failed to reach, and was unwilling to repent of the sin and repair his relationship with God, who set the standard in the first place.  His solution?  Silence God’s prophet!

Herod was content with this arrangement—no more public embarrassment!—but his unlawfully wedded wife, Herodias, saw things differently.  She “had a grudge against [John] and wanted to put him to death” (Mk 6.19), although Herod “feared John” and “kept him safe” (v20).  But Herod gave in and had John executed when Herodias told her daughter to request it.  Why would he grant such a request?  Because he had “promised with an oath to give her whatever she might ask” (Mt 14.7), and didn’t want to be embarrassed in front of his guests by going back on his word.  Alright then, why did he make such a vow to young Salome?  Because she “danced before the company and pleased Herod” (v6).  It is often supposed that the dance was lewd, which would add yet another dimension to this awful picture—Salome would have been roughly 13 years old at the time, and was Herod’s niece, not to mention his step-daughter—but the Bible doesn’t make this detail clear.

In any case, what we see here is a long list of sinful behaviors and attitudes, tied together with rash and foolish choices, leading to even greater sin.  Sure, at the end of the day everyone involved got what they wanted: the prophet who accused them of sin can no longer speak.  But what did they have to embrace and do, in order to get there?  Sin often begets further sin, undertaken either to cover up the first one, or to entrench ourselves in the denial of wrongdoing.  When we do this, it’s ultimately because we don’t like our faults and shortcomings being exposed and put on display.  For most people it doesn’t lead to a place where a young girl cheerfully carries a freshly disembodied head on a platter to her mother, who implicated the girl in the man’s unjust killing; that’s both an extreme example, and the consequence of finding oneself close to political power.  But how often do we use whatever means are reasonably within our grasp to hide from the light?

Jesus is that light—he called himself “the light of the world” (Jn 8.12) and told Nicodemus how the world responds to the light:

“the light has come into the world, and people loved the darkness rather than the light because their works were evil. For everyone who does wicked things hates the light and does not come to the light, lest his works should be exposed. But whoever does what is true comes to the light, so that it may be clearly seen that his works have been carried out in God.” (John 3.19-21)

This is why Herod and Herodias wanted John silenced.  They didn’t like the light, because their works were evil.  We’ve all committed evil acts—not just in the abstract sense that we’re imperfect beings in an imperfect world, but we made deliberate decisions to do things that we knew were wrong.  Maybe you’re years removed from the works done in darkness.  Maybe you were wicked last month.  It’s more likely that you sinned yesterday, or even an hour ago.  Will you follow the example of Herod and burrow deeper into the mire in a fruitless attempt to remain hidden?  Or will you welcome the light, examine yourself—including all your flaws—and start doing what is true, instead?

Jeremy Nettles

Share